🎈 Nikon 70 200 F4 Vs F2 8

Stopped down to f/5.6, the sharpness on the Nikon 300mm f/2.8 improves and gets very comparable to the 200-400mm. Nikon 300mm f/2.8 + TC-17E II vs Nikon 200-400mm f/4.0 + TC-14E II. Now here is an interesting comparison – if we take the Nikon 300mm f/2.8 and add the TC-17E II, we end up at 510mm. While I keep seeing that the 70-200 f/2.8 G2 is really good and a worthy alternative to the vastly more expensive Nikon versions, the f/4 version just looked like crap in the review. If you have the money for the Nikon, get that, or consider if you want the extra stop of speed from the Tamron f/2.8 G2. Vignetting is not an issue with either of these lenses. The 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 has negligible vignetting at any setting, while the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 only has noticeable vignetting wide open at f/2.8 (and even then, it’s not bad). Stop the 70-200mm down to f/4, and especially f/5.6, and vignetting disappears. 4. Hello, I own a 70-200 F2.8 VR II, which is a great lens. 47 Nikon Software; 26 Nikon Deals; 760 General Discussions; 49 Gear Reviews; 180 Other Manufacturers; 105 But if you’re photographing small birds that are 10-15 meters away from you or greater (30+ feet), 800mm will be ideal. Whereas 400mm and 600mm lenses work better for general wildlife photography outings. NIKON Z 9 + NIKKOR Z 800mm f/6.3 VR S @ 800mm, ISO 6400, 1/500, f/6.3. NIKON Z 7 + NIKKOR Z 800mm f/6.3 VR S @ 800mm, ISO 1800, 1/3200, f/6.3. So, no. Optics quality is surrely on Nikon's side. I have found two of these. "Nikon jewel" 80-200 f4, and "fastes Nikon autofocus" lens 70-210 4-5.6 D. Here, they are both around 120 US dollars. Fast autofocus is adventage, but constant f4 is also. Manual focusing is ok too. Nikon D500 Nikon D810 Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC LD Aspherical (IF) Tamron 10-24mm F3.5-4.5 (B023) Tamron SP 70-200 F2.8 G2 +8 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain A D4 is 1340 grams, a 70-200 is 1470 grams, so nearly equal weight. If you use the tripod collar, the bayonet has to deal with exactly the same weight relations, because on the other side of the bayonet is a body of nearly 3 pounds, with flash even much more. The Nikon bayonet can carry much more weight than you think. F-Mount Lens/FX Format. Aperture Range: f/2.8 to f/22. One XLD Element, Five LD Elements. eBAND, BBAR, and Fluorine Coatings. Show More. A popular telephoto zoom for a variety of shooting applications, this Nikon F-mount SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Lens from Tamron is characterized by its bright f/2.8 constant maximum aperture, as well as At 100mm the 100-400 is f/4.5 vs f/2.8 so at lower focal lengths, the 70-200 wins, but when you extend out to 400mm you will be getting the equivalent DOF. Let’s be clear, I’m not proposing the 100-400 as a shallow DOF portrait lens, just saying under the right conditions you could achieve similar outcomes. The one I am interested EF 70-200L/4.0 IS II vs 70-200 GM @200mm/F4.0 in TDP test. 70-200 GM is known has copy variation, and I am not a big fan of studio test in close distance on resolution chart but prefer outdoor test from distance to be more resemble in real-world usage. So just for reference. SteveCooper wrote: I can't comment on the new Sigma or the new Nikon. I CAN tell you that I've had older versions of the 70-200 f/2.8 from Sigma and Tamron, and I finally was able to purchase a used Nikon VRII version and it exceeded my expectations. .

nikon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8